Here are they points observed by Punjab and Haryana high court on Patiala Police, controversial SSP Nanak Singh and his conduct.
1. Justice Moudgil said that a comprehensive text was sent at 9:48 Am to Patiala SSPย Nanak Singh, a day after the incident, yet there was no FIR
2. Justice Moudgil expressed shock that Patiala Police used a statement by a dhaba owner Karanjot to register a case against Army officer but did not use medico-legal record available on grievous injuries on Colonel Pushpinder Bath till eight days
3. Controversial SSP Nanak Singh did not preserve CCTV footage of incident
4. 20 calls were made to police authorities in Patiala
5. Four Inspectors Harry Boparai,Rauni Singh, Shaminder Singh and Harjinder Dhillon came out of the SUV and took away the mobile phones despite Colonel reminding him that he was stationed at a sensitive post and his phone contained sensitive information.